![]() ![]() With the Clone-Tool, however, you are now able to easily repair defects by stamping data from similar, undamaged areas onto the damaged areas. These tools are able to detect large defects, but are unfit to correct them. SilverFast HDR Studio 8 now features three differently focused tools for the correction of a wide variety of issues, making post-processing in other software unnecessary.ĭust and scratch removal tools, such as iSRD and SRDx, quickly reach their limit in cases of serious defects, such as wide scratches, finger-prints or large-area damage. These two tools combined can increase the usable dynamic range of almost any scanner on the market today.Īn addition to the existing set of dust, scratch and defect removal tools, the SilverFast Clone-Tool is a powerful tool for the removal of severe defects. This has become an an invaluable tool, especially when working with scanners offering limited dynamic range. Multi-sampling now includes auto-alignment, enabling this feature even on scanners without hardware-based support.ĪACO allows the user to extract maximum detail from shadow areas, without compromising highlights. These new functions of SilverFast Ai Studio offer an even higher degree of efficiency for image optimization. SilverFast Ai Studio includes all of the well-known functions of SilverFast Ai plus many new, innovative tools. Once you’ve set this up as a preset then you can quickly apply it to all your negative scans.SilverFast Ai Studio for Epson 8.8.0.3 Multilingual | File Size: 93.99 MB I had a play with Dark Table using a Colorchecker image to set the various black and white points and make a custom inversion for Kodak ProImage. HDR also does dust removal without IR (SRDx). Thats one reason I’m playing with DarkTable - lots of the negative inversions depend on Lightroom or Photoshop, whereas DarkTable is free If you open one up in a normal photo editor the IR channel hasn't been removed - I suppose that’s what SilverFast HDR does. I thought the DNG recorded a 48 bit image plus the IR channel if you have one. ![]() I had a 8200 and I could do a full 3600ppi scan + IR dust removal in about 4 minutes, but it’s very dependent on what you do - no IR is quicker and saves quicker, smaller res is quicker In my inexperienced test, it seemed great. I would say 30-40 minutes for a roll of 36.ĭoesn't it record all the information while scanning as DNG? But that's acceptable because 48bit dng scanning is honestly fairly fast. That's the best I could afford with lmy budget. ![]() Please let me know what do you think about the option. However, is it worth the investment for Black and White images?īut that's all the opinion of a beginner. They demo works well with tiff and dslr scan as well which i a cherry on the top. The intermediate images here are TIFF files which can be used for essentially the same purposes as the DNG files.Īlso I don't need vuescan, because the free Silverfast Se is already doing the job. I’ve recently been playing with linear scans using VueScan following the instructions on here - and then converting them with ColorPerfect ( I’m working towards an end result of developing a non-Adobe standardized workflow using DarkTable ). Now my way of scanning is to get everything right in the scanning software and save as JPEG - I imagine if you’re saving and then want to post process later that might be slightly different. I can imagine if you had an automated feeder such as the Plustek 135i, but with the 8100 you’ve got to feed it by hand anyway. I’ve never found the “conversion” part of SilverFast to be the rate determining step, it’s normally the scan time. I have been playing with Silverfast HDR.Īs a non Adobe user, it Looks like a logical option if I just want to quickly Scan my negative as a DNG. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |